15.Commitments and Contingencies

Yodlee, each of the members of the Yodlee Board, the Company and Merger Sub have been named as defendants in two putative class actions challenging the merger in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware.  The suits are captioned Suman Inala v. Yodlee, Inc., et al. (Case No. 11461) (filed September 2, 2015 and amended on October 14, 2015) and Guillaume Wieland-Paquet v. Yodlee, Inc., et al. (Case No. 11611) (filed October 14, 2015).  The complaints allege, among other things, that the Yodlee Board breached its fiduciary duties by agreeing to sell Yodlee through a conflicted process and by failing to ensure that Yodlee stockholders received adequate and fair value for their shares.  The complaints also now allege that the Form S-4 Registration Statement filed by Envestnet, which contained Yodlee’s proxy statement, failed to disclose material information to Yodlee’s stockholder.  The complaints also allege that the Company and Merger Sub have aided and abetted these breaches of fiduciary duties. The plaintiffs seek as relief, among other things, an injunction against the merger, rescission of the merger agreement to the extent it is already implemented, an award of damages and attorneys’ fees. The Company believes the lawsuits are without merit.

The Company is involved in litigation arising in the ordinary course of its business. The Company does not believe that the outcome of any of the current litigation, individually or in the aggregate, would, if determined adversely to it, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition, cash flows or business.

The Company includes various types of indemnification and guarantee clauses in certain arrangements. These indemnifications and guarantees may include, but are not limited to, infringement claims related to intellectual property, direct or consequential damages and guarantees to certain service providers and service level requirements with certain customers. The type and amount of any potential indemnification or guarantee varies substantially based on the nature of each arrangement. The Company has experienced no previous claims and cannot determine the maximum amount of potential future payments, if any, related to such indemnification and guarantee provisions. The Company believes that it is unlikely it will have to make material payments under these arrangements and therefore has not recorded a contingent liability in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The Company rents office space under leases that expire at various dates through 2026.  Future minimum lease commitments under these operating leases, as of September 30, 2015, were as follows: